- jurisdiction in cyberspace
- key: cyberspace is borderless!
- jurisdiction in general [real-world background]
- general
- present in the jurisdiction, bulk of activity
- specific
- purposeful availment: does the claim arise from the forum-related activities?
- limited by burden on out-of-staters, but if it is possible to show that the defendant purposefully availed themselves of the forum, then jurisdiction will be had
- minimum contacts and internet commerce
- cases deal with jurisdiction based on information posted online
- development through cases: passive vs. active sites…
- but does not work with torts like libel and slander – jurisdiction lies where the harm is felt, “effect-test” jurisdiction [Caldwell] – except problems arise in the international context
- cyberspace as its own forum / jurisdiction
- what level of posting to subject to jurisdiction?
- “data havens” to worldwide jurisdiction
- is there a possible middle-ground?
- level of interactivity?
- location of server? [not valid, server could be anywhere]
- conflict of laws
- judgment enforcement
- cross-border issues
- contractual choice of law and forum
- choice of law and forum
- generally, choice of law and forum clauses in a contract will be deemed enforceable [unless unreasonable, i.e., not reasonably related to the transaction]
- arbitration
- arbitration clauses are nearly uniformly enforced – the only way to avoid an arbitration clause is to show that a contract was not formed under state law
Recent comments
11 weeks 4 days ago
11 weeks 4 days ago
23 weeks 1 day ago
23 weeks 2 days ago
40 weeks 3 days ago
40 weeks 3 days ago